Alonso Lopez
Professor Villa
13 October 2015
Making the
Mediterranean—Weekly Reflection #1
I
find it ironic that just yesterday, October 12th, we ‘celebrated’
Columbus Day in the United States on the same week that we are asked to write
about while the Columbian Exchange. While many celebrate his ‘discover’, many
more vilify the effects that his voyages have caused not only to the Americas, but
also just as much to the African continent. I will first point to a few main
negative consequences of the Colombian Exchange, they being the diseases
brought to the Americas and the forced migrations most heavily concentrated
from Africa. As our reading on the exchange for this week depicts, “The list of
infectious diseases that spread from the Old World to the New is long; the
major killers include smallpox, measles, whooping cough, chicken pox, bubonic
plague, typhus, and malaria…it is estimated that upwards of 80-95 percent of
the Native American population was decimated within the first 100-150 years
following 1492” (Ninn and Qian 2010, 165). The devastation of the American
native population led to the African continent consequence, and perhaps a main
reason why it is the most underdeveloped continent in the world today: “Between
the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries, over twelve million Africans were
shipped to the Americas during the transatlantic trade, the largest involuntary
migration in human history. The trade was fueled by the high demand for labor
in the Americas, which was driven…by two aspects of the Columbian Exchange: The
first was the spread of Old World diseases to Native Americans…The second was
the cultivation of highly prized Old World Crops, such as sugar and coffee”
(Ninn and Qian 2010, 181). This brings me to the positive one positive effect
that I will focus on in this reflection: the introduction of new crops to both
worlds, more specifically, for the purpose of this paper and the Italian case,
the introduction of tomatoes to the Old World: “The first documented authentic
recipe in Italy appeared in 1692 in an early Italian cookbook” (Ninn and Qian
2010, 172). This quotation exemplifies the authenticity of Italian cuisine as
being deeply rooted in tomatoes and its associated products. However, as we
discussed in class during week one’s Thursday lecture, such adaptation to the
European diet was a slow process due to negative connotations associated with
the tomato upon its initial arrival to the Old World.
It
took nearly three centuries for the tomato to be accepted as nutritionally
valuable food product in Europe and, more specifically, a staple food in Italy.
As Gentilcore David states, “We [may’ naturally assume that Italians liked
tomatoes right away, but in fact quite the opposite is true. The tomato took
more than three hundred years to enter Italian mainstream cultivation and
consumption” (David 2010, 2-3). I am an example of such natural assumption as
an American. Before gaining this knowledge about tomatoes’ initial rejection, I
thought tomatoes were joyfully accepted when first brought from the new world.
This image of quick adaptation gained further solidification within me upon my
arrival in Florence through my experiences in all of the restaurants I ate at
during my first weekend here. The reason is that most dishes on every menu
offered tomato or tomato sauce with its cuisine; if it wasn’t on pasta it was
pizza and many more. David states the tomato’s initial suspicions: inadequate
climate in Europe made tomatoes hard to grow (perhaps the reason why tomatoes
were described as gold rather than red); their trailing habit was inauspicious,
as proximity to the ground tended to suggest low status; their association to
toxic and inedible varieties (presence of an alkaloid called tomatine found in
unripe tomatoes); they had no obvious functions to recommend them; they could
not satisfy the vast hunger at the time
(David 2010, 26). The change of perception came when it began to
complement and enhance the flavors of existing foods, after the assumption that
it was toxic was disproved, it was used for medicinal/health purposes like
aiding digestion. Furthermore, it was cheap and available during the summer
months when little other fruits/vegetables weren’t available. Such acceptance
is seen in the Matilede reading: “The copper saucepans and pastry pans
sparkled, and the oven was always lit; all kinds of pizza could be found there:
pizza with tomato” (Matilde 2012, 2).
In
conclusion, through my observations and experiences in Florence so far, I can
see tomatoes’ prevalence in Italian recipes and cuisine as a whole. And, as
stated in class, I can see how tomato and its products may stimulate the
appetite with delicate and pleasing foods. Every time I take a bite out of a
tomato, I have an urge to chase it with another food type, something more
pleasing. I, myself, have never been a big fan of tomatoes but I’m trying to
build a taste for it here in Italy since it’s a staple food and has many health
benefits, at least according to class.
I am now entitled to close with my tomato shopping experience at Conad
just yesterday. I had never seen so many varieties and shaped of tomatoes in
one store. I went with the most oddly shaped, red ones, since those usually
entail their organic genetic makeup. Its texture was soft but its flavor was a
bit bold, which made me think that maybe it was not as organic as I thought it
was (flavorless tomatoes back in the United States usually entail this). But
perhaps the taste just has to do with the type of tomatoes that I selected,
whose name I cannot recall. It therefore becomes clear how and why Europeans
became to associate the crop with negative connotations upon its initial
introduction to the Old World.

Nessun commento:
Posta un commento