Nicholas
Martinez
10/27/15
Reading Response #3
During the beginning part of this program,
we discussed the importance of the Mediterranean, the Ottoman Empire in
particular, serving as a contact zone for many different cultures, ethnic
backgrounds, and the religions of the empire. The material presented in the
weeks classes and readings were able to validate this claim and it is
interesting to discover the give-and-take relationship from the perspective of
the Italians. Also, I think that it was important to talk about the Ottoman
Empire in order to understand the other aspects of the Mediterranean.
I
enjoyed the Braudel’s description of the Mediterranean Sea, not only as an
obstacle or barrier between lands, but also as a source of unity, transport,
and a means of exchange and intercourse.
The way he described the Mediterranean itself as being formed through
the movement of people really stood out to me, and I think showed very well how
lives and identities in the region have historically been anything but static
(201). He argues that lives and identities are fluid and that we should look
into how this region was a melting pot of cultures and rituals.
It
is also important to note that large towns, which stood at crossroads, did not
necessarily see growth. The crossroad simply created a change in route of
transportation (228). Ultimately, large roads and the exchanges they permitted
led to the gradual division of labor where cities distinguished themselves from
the countryside. “The starting point of this process was commercial activity-
in places like Venice, Seville, Genoa, Milan, and Marseilles in the 16th
century (229). When the division between country and city life was beginning,
Venice established itself as an industrial port, regarded for banking while
Genoa was regarded as the most sophisticated credit machinery of the middle
Ages. By 1607 all “capitalist” activity was in the hands of Florentines who
owned houses in the city and the Genoese who provided silver (Braudel 232) -
between them, they controlled all exchanges.
Yesterday, I attended the film screening of “La Grande Bellezza”.
In this film, the main character, Jep, and his friends, who were part of the
Roman elite, enjoyed giant parties, outrageous expositions of art, extensive
meals, and the company of strippers. Yet as I watched this film, I realized
that Jep was tired of his empty life and kept thinking of his past. Venetian
renegades had done something similar. When they had tired of Constantinople,
they moved back to Venice to rejoin their loved ones and reconverted. The
lifestyle of Jep and his high class friends were much how the upper class
Venetians lived. The way Venice is characterized here is comparable to the way
life was portrayed in Rome in the film, “La Grande Bellezza.” “Venetian style
meant fashionable people who listened to music, engaged in witty conversation,
all with proper doses of theater, gambling, drinking, and fine dining” (Wright,
2000).
Finally,
though I know there are differences between the Eastern and Western
Mediterranean in terms of religion, art, architecture, and many other factors.
It is fascinating to see how different the West and East, but made the attempt
to co-mingle in the Ottoman Empire. Also, I want to investigate further how
religion and nation seem to be intertwined, but at the same time nonexistent
throughout these communities and how that affected the patrons of these cities.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento