This past week’s readings we
examined how the Mediterranean acted as a fluid surface for economic and social
exchange. The Mediterranean was also pivotal in the political systems between
Ottoman Empire, Republic of Venice, and the rest of Europe in creating
alliances and prolonging rivalries. Port cities such as Venice and Istanbul
played a central role in creating a communication network inside the
Mediterranean region, especially the interactions between East and West. We
looked at the pattern of food consumption and reflections based on travel
literature to analyze the Mediterranean conflicts and connections. Furthermore,
we were able to construct a vivid image of the narratives of important
individuals from reports and correspondence of migrants, merchants, and
ambassadors. Although these examinations provide a detailed illustration of the
economic, social, and political activities of fifteenth until the eighteenth century
Europe, these evaluations can give us an idea of why leaders and subjects of the
time acted the way the did in times of war, peace, and great prosperity.
In The Mediterranean and Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Braudel
explains how the Mediterranean was not only a physical unit, but also a human
unit that connects towns and cities through sea, river, and land routes. These
trade routes served as a means to communicate between distant communities and
without these routes towns risk economic stagnation or abandonment. Braudel
writes that the Mediterranean greatly relied on small boats for shipping since
they were able to load goods quickly and sold their services cheaply. Although
he states that large boats such as galleys were not favored in the
Mediterranean trade activities, the modern world has shifted to a larger
commercial trade network, especially in the Mediterranean. When I visited
Venice, the port that was once lauded as the most important trading port of
Europe, has modernized and expanded to accommodate the large ships and tonnage.
Today, trade in Venice is not limited to the Mediterranean, but is connected
with the rest of the world. Mercantilism no longer exists because individual
merchants, similar to the Ottoman and Venetian merchants of the Renaissance
would not be able to survive against the capitalist corporations that dominate
the world economy.
In Venice and the Islamic World, Carboni writes about the love-hate
relationship between Venice and the Ottoman Empire. Both the Republic and the
Empire engaged in major naval battles over a span of three centuries. However,
the two Mediterranean powers enjoyed long periods of peace and friendly
relations on the commercial and political levels. This resulted in the exchange
of Venetian and Ottoman cultures that greatly influenced the economy and
society. For example, in Istanbul I saw the Levantine areas, primarily the
Galata district, that were once trading and housing areas for Venetian and
other European merchants. These trading areas provided economic wealth to the
Ottoman Empire since the sultan’s income consisted on taxing non-Muslims
subjects and accepting Venetian tributes.
During my visit in Venice this past weekend, I witnessed the Ottoman
influence that once affected Venetian society. Several buildings were
incorporated a few Ottoman architectural designs such as the St. Peter’s
Basilica and Doge Palace. Although Venice and the Ottomans had some hostility
towards each other, both were more welcoming of each other since they depended
on each other for economic growth and political influence between the East and
the West.
Maria Pia Pedani gives us a better
picture of the close relationship between Venice and the Ottoman Imperial
Palace in Safiye’s Household and Venetian
Diplomacy. Pedani writes how Venetians presented pieces of furniture to
members of the Ottoman imperial family as a gift to congratulate the newly
engage wife-to-be. Furthermore, many Christian women went to Istanbul to join
their male relatives who gained important positions in the Imperial
administration. This perspective of the imperial household further supports the
notion that inter-religious and inter-cultural marriages between Ottomans and
Venetians were important to maintain peace between the two powers. Venetian
presence in the Ottoman capital pleased the sultan because they relished on the
European tributes and saw that Venetian merchants contributed to the wealth of
the Empire. On the other hand, the Republic of Venice valued their peace treaty
with the Ottomans because it allowed free trade between the three continents,
which helped Venetians amass a great amount of wealth.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento